PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2015 | 125 | 1 | 9-13
Article title

Cataract surgery today and 20 years ago

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Introduction. Cataract surgery is one of the most important surgical procedures in ophthalmology. Aim. The aim of this study is to compare cataract surgeries performed in 1994 and 2014. Material and methods. A retrospective analysis of 100 cataract procedures in 1994, as well as a total of 100 cataract procedures performed in 2014. The authors considered the following factors: age, sex, vision acuity, cataract type, preoperative patient preparation, intra- and postoperative complications, and total hospitalization time. Results. Back in 1994, extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) was the most common treatment technique. It caused more intraoperative complications (46) and postoperative complications (38) and longer total hospitalization time (9.25 days±3.25 SD). In 2014, all procedures were performed using phacoemulsification. As a result, the number of intraoperative (20) and postoperative (14) complications has dropped significantly. Total hospitalization time was also reduced (1.53 days±1.08 SD). Conclusions. Phacoemulsification significantly improved cataract treatment. This method is much safer and more effective than ECCE.
Publisher

Year
Volume
125
Issue
1
Pages
9-13
Physical description
Dates
published
1 - 3 - 2015
online
9 - 5 - 2015
Contributors
  • Department of Diagnostics and Microsurgery of Glaucoma, Medical University, Lublin, Poland, madejaga@o2.pl
  • Department of Diagnostics and Microsurgery of Glaucoma, Medical University, Lublin, Poland
References
  • 1. Pascolini D, Mariotti SP. Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012; 96:614-8.
  • 2. Archiwum GUS. Stan zdrowia ludności Polski w 2004 r. [http://www.stat.gov.pl/gus/5840_658_PLK_HTML.htm?action=show_archive]
  • 3. Dostęp do opieki okulistycznej w Polsce. Podejście systemowe. Najważniejsze problemy związane z dostępem doświadczeń okulistycznych. CEESTAHC 2012. [http://www.ceestahc.org/pliki/nasze_publikacje/raporty/Dostep_do_opieki_okulistycznej_w_Polsce.pdf]
  • 4. Soczewka i zaćma. Basic and Clinical Science Course. Section 11. 2005-2006.
  • 5. Żarnowski T, Chmiel M, Haszcz D, Zagórski Z. Evaluation of astigmatism and blood-aqueous barrier breakdown following procedures in the anterior eye segment. Klin Oczna. 1998;100(1):11-4.
  • 6. Szymulska M, Haszcz D, Rakowska E, Zagórski Z. Wartość badań bakteriologicznych w chirurgii zaćmy. Klin Oczna. 1996;98:125-7.
  • 7. Apt L, Isenberg SJ, Yoshimori R, et al. The effect of povidone-iodine solution applied at the conclusion of ophthalmic surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1995;119:701-5.
  • 8. Ciulla TA, Starr MB, Masket S. Bacterial endophthalmitis prophylaxis for cataract surgery: an evidence-based update. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:13-24.
  • 9. Barry P, Cordovès L, Gardner S. Wytyczne ESCRS dotczące profilaktyki i leczenia zapalenia wnętrza gałki ocznej po operacji zaćmy: dane, dylematy i wnioski 2013. [http://www.escrs.org/endophthalmitis/guidelines/POLISH.pdf]
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.-psjd-doi-10_1515_pjph-2015-0013
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.