PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2014 | 1 | 1 |
Article title

Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasonic
Transducers for Photoacoustic Imaging: Modeling
and Simulation of Structural Parameters on
Receive Performance

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Introduction: Although many piezoelectric micromachined
ultrasonic transducers (pMUTs) with different
structures have been presented and fabricated for photoacoustic
imaging (PAI), most of them are lack of systemic
analysis and optimizations of design parameters.
It is of important to explore the internal physical mechanisms
and corresponding cause-effect relationships of the
receive performance of pMUTs with different structures.
The purpose of this study is to present a novel numerical
method for an efficient design of the AlN-based pMUT for
application in PAI system.
Methods: A planar and two curved (dome-shaped and
concave) structures of pMUTs based on aluminum nitride
(AlN) were modeled numerically in this study. For each
pMUT, the performance of receive sensitivity was simulated
systemically using the finite elements analysis (FEA).
Moreover, the physical parameters of three structureswere
analyzed in detail, such as the radius of curvature, the
height of SiO2, the height of AlN and the height of polyimide.
Results: The obtained results show that the receive performance
of three structures in water or air could be ordered
as: the dome-shaped > the concave > the planar. Further,
several valuable findings of this study would be used to
design pMUTs so as to achieve better receive performance,
such as: (a) for an optimum radius of curvature almost exists
for any curved pMUT, (b) a thinner supporting layer
means a better receive performance, (c) the piezoelectric
layer in three structures have an optimum thickness, and
(d) the height of polyimide affects little the receive performance
in all structures.
Conclusions: For a pMUT-based ultrasound sensor in photoacoustic
imaging (PAI), the dome-shaped pMUT has a
better receive sensitivity than that of the planar structure
and the concave structure, whose physical parameters
combining the work frequency could be optimized efficiently with a numerical method.
Publisher

Year
Volume
1
Issue
1
Physical description
Dates
accepted
20 - 5 - 2015
received
21 - 1 - 2015
online
23 - 11 - 2015
Contributors
author
  • School of Physical Electronics,
    University of Electronic Science and Technology of China,
    Chengdu, China 610054
  • School of Physical Electronics,
    University of Electronic Science and Technology of China,
    Chengdu, China 610054
author
  • School of Physical Electronics,
    University of Electronic Science and Technology of China,
    Chengdu, China 610054
author
  • School of Physical Electronics,
    University of Electronic Science and Technology of China,
    Chengdu, China 610054
author
  • School of Physical Electronics,
    University of Electronic Science and Technology of China,
    Chengdu, China 610054
  • Center for Information in BioMedicine, University of Electronic
    Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China 610054
References
  • [1] Beard P, Biomedical photoacoustic imaging, Interface focus,2011: rsfs20110028.
  • [2] Oraevsky A A, Andreev V A, Karabutov A A, et al. Laser optoacousticimaging of the breast: detection of cancer angiogenesis,International Biomedical Optics Symposium. InternationalSociety for Optics and Photonics, 1999: 352-363.
  • [3] Wang X, Pang Y, Ku G, et al. Noninvasive laser-induced photoacoustictomography for structural and functional in vivo imagingof the brain. Nature biotechnology, 2003, 21(7): 803-806.[Crossref]
  • [4] Sethuraman S, Amirian J H, Litovsky S H, et al. Ex vivo characterizationof atherosclerosis using intravascular photoacousticimaging. Optics express, 2007, 15(25): 16657-16666.[WoS][Crossref]
  • [5] Hu S, Maslov K, Wang L V. Noninvasive label-free imaging ofmicrohemodynamics by optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy.Optics express, 2009, 17(9): 7688-7693.[Crossref][WoS]
  • [6] Zhang H F, Maslov K, Stoica G, et al. Functional photoacousticmicroscopy for high-resolution and noninvasive in vivo imaging.Nature biotechnology, 2006, 24(7): 848-851.[Crossref]
  • [7] Wang L V, Hu S. Photoacoustic tomography: in vivo imaging fromorganelles to organs. Science, 2012, 335(6075): 1458-1462.[WoS]
  • [8] Xi L, Zhou L, Jiang H. C-scan photoacoustic microscopy for invivoimaging of Drosophila pupae. Applied Physics Letters, 2012,101(1): 013702.[Crossref][WoS]
  • [9] Yao L, Jiang H. Finite-element-based photoacoustic tomographyin time domain. Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics,2009, 11(8): 085301.
  • [10] Yao L, Sun Y, Jiang H. Transport-based quantitative photoacoustictomography: simulations and experiments. Physics inmedicine and biology, 2010, 55(7): 1917.
  • [11] Yang J M, Maslov K, Yang H C, et al. Photoacoustic endoscopy.Optics letters, 2009, 34(10): 1591-1593.[Crossref][WoS]
  • [12] Yang H, Xi L, Samuelson S, et al. Handheld miniature probe integratingdiffuse optical tomography with photoacoustic imagingthrough a MEMS scanning mirror. Biomedical optics express,2013, 4(3): 427-432.[Crossref][WoS]
  • [13] Jansen K, Springeling G, Lancée C, et al. An intravascularphotoacoustic imaging catheter. Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS).IEEE, 2010: 378-381.
  • [14] Karpiouk A B,Wang B, Emelianov S Y. Development of a catheterfor combined intravascular ultrasound and photoacoustic imaging.Review of Scientific Instruments, 2010, 81(1): 014901.[WoS]
  • [15] Wang Y F, Yang Y, Ren T L, et al. Ultrasonic transducer arraydesign for medical imaging based on MEMS technologies.Biomedical Engineering and Informatics (BMEI), 2010 3rd InternationalConference on. IEEE, 2010, 2: 666-669.
  • [16] Sammoura F, Shelton S, Akhbari S, et al. A two-port piezoelectricmicromachined ultrasonic transducer. Electronic PackagingTechnology (ICEPT), 2014 15th International Conference on.IEEE, 2014: 1-4.
  • [17] Liao W, Liu W, Rogers J E, et al. Piezeoelectric micromachinedultrasound tranducer array for photoacoustic imaging. Solid-State Sensors, Actuators and Microsystems (TRANSDUCERS &EUROSENSORS XXVII), 2013 Transducers &Eurosensors XXVII:The 17th International Conference on. IEEE, 2013: 1831-1834.
  • [18] Dausch D E, Gilchrist K H, Carlson J B, et al. In vivo real-time3-D intracardiac echo using PMUT arrays. Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics,and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on, 2014,61(10): 1754-1764.[Crossref]
  • [19] Hajati A, Latev D, Gardner D, et al. Three-dimensional microelectromechanical system piezoelectric ultrasound transducer.Applied Physics Letters, 2012, 101(25): 253101.[Crossref]
  • [20] Akhbari S, Sammoura F, Shelton S, et al. Highly responsivecurved aluminum nitride pMUT. Micro Electro Mechanical Systems(MEMS), 2014 IEEE 27th International Conference on. IEEE,2014: 124-127.
  • [21] Sammoura F, Akhbari S, Lin L. An analytical solution for curvedpiezoelectric micromachined ultrasonic transducers withspherically shaped diaphragms. Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics,and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on, 2014, 61(9):1533-1544.[WoS][Crossref]
  • [22] Guedes A, Shelton S, Przybyla R, et al. Aluminum nitride pMUTbased on a flexurally-suspended membrane. Solid-State Sensors,Actuators and Microsystems Conference (TRANSDUCERS),2011 16th International. IEEE, 2011: 2062-2065.
  • [23] Vernet J L, Steichen W, Lardat R, et al. PMUTS design optimizationfor medical probes applications. Ultrasonics Symposium,2001 IEEE. IEEE, 2001, 2: 899-902.
  • [24] Akasheh F, Fraser J D, Bose S, et al. Piezoelectric micromachinedultrasonic transducers: Modeling the influence of structuralparameters on device performance. Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control, IEEE Transactions on, 2005, 52(3): 455-468.[Crossref]
  • [25] Agag T, Koga T, Takeichi T. Studies on thermal and mechanicalproperties of polyimide–clay nanocomposites. Polymer, 2001,42(8): 3399-3408.[Crossref]
  • [26] Fu D, Ren T L, Chen H, et al. A novel method for fabricating2-D array piezoelectric micromachined ultrasonic transducersfor medical imaging. Applications of Ferroelectrics, 2009. ISAF2009. 18th IEEE International Symposium on the. IEEE, 2009: 1-4.
  • [27] Lu Y, Heidari A, Shelton S, et al. High frequency piezoelectricmicromachined ultrasonic transducer array for intravascular ultrasoundimaging. Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS),2014 IEEE 27th International Conference on. IEEE, 2014: 745-748.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.-psjd-doi-10_1515_phto-2015-0007
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.