PL EN


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2015 | 9 | 4 | 189-208
Article title

Decision Accuracy for the Relevant-Irrelevant Screening Test: Influence of an Algorithm on Human Decision-Making

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
Publisher
Year
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
189-208
Physical description
Dates
published
1 - 12 - 2015
online
12 - 2 - 2016
References
  • Ansley N., Weir R. (1976): a numerical scoring system for Relevant-Irrelevant polygraph tests. Paper presented at the 1976 Annual Seminar of the American Polygraph Association.
  • Barland G.H. (1988): Th e polygraph test in the USA and elsewhere. In A. Gale (Ed.) Th e polygraph test: Lies, truth and science. Sage Publications, London.
  • Blackwell N.J. (1999): Polyscore 3.3 and psychophysiological detection of deception examiner rates of accuracy when scoring examinations from actual criminal investigations. Polygraph 28 (2), 149-175.
  • Carter G., Polger P. (1986): a 20-year summary of National Weather Service verifi cation results for temperature and precipitation. Technical Memorandum NWS FCST 31. Washington DC, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
  • Elaad E., Ginton A., Ben-Shakhar G. (1994): Th e eff ects of prior expectations and outcome knowledge on polygraph examiners’ decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7 (4), 279-292.
  • Harris J.C., McQuarrie A.D. (ca 2001): Th e Relevant/Irrelevant Algorithm Description and Validation Results. Th e Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory.
  • Krapohl D., McManus B. (1999): An objective method for manually scoring polygraph data. Polygraph, 28 (3), 209-222.
  • Krapohl D., Rosales T. (2014): Decision accuracy for the Relevant-Irrelevant Screening Test: a partial replication. Polygraph, 41 (1), 20-29.
  • Krapohl D., Senter S., Stern B. (2005): An exploration of methods for the analysis of multiple-issue relevant/irrelevant screening data. Polygraph, 34 (1), 47-61.
  • Krapohl D.J., Shaw P.K. (2015): Polygraph Screening. In Fundamentals of Polygraph Practice. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
  • Silver N. (2012): Th e Signal and the Noise: Why so Many Predictions Fail - but Some Don’t. Penguin Books, New York.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.-psjd-doi-10_1515_ep-2015-0007
Identifiers
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.