Full-text resources of PSJD and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl


Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2015 | 28 | 1 | 8-12

Article title

Is the vignette method used to assess quality of life in practice?


Title variants

Languages of publication



Purpose. To define how extensive is the use of the vignettes method for quality of life assessment. Methods. An internet search of different databases was performed to identify and enumerate the publications involving studies in which the vignettes method is employed in relation to quality of life assessment (QoL). PubMed-Medline and Cochrane were scrutinized for publications based on the same search criteria. Results. Our search found that 6 Cochrane and 105 Medline publications, as well as 28 articles were published between 2011-2014. However, only 7 match the objective of the search. Conclusion. The rating of vignettes is a promising additional technique to measure changes in QoL and utilities, however, it is not very often employed by the researchers. It can be considered for use as supplementary method to standard QoL measurement methods.









Physical description


1 - 3 - 2015
19 - 1 - 2015
9 - 1 - 2015
9 - 5 - 2015


  • Department of Dermatology, Military Institute of Medicine, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
  • Department of Applied Pharmacy, Medical University of Lublin, 1 Chodzki Str. 20-093 Lublin, Poland
  • Faculty of Social Science, Warsaw University of Life Sciences – SGGW, Warsaw, Poland
  • Department of Dermatology, Military Institute of Medicine, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
  • Department of Child and Adolescent Health, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland


  • 1. Au N., Lorgelly P.K.: Anchoring vignettes for health comparisons: an analysis of response consistency. Qual Life Res., 23, 6, 2014. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0615-2.[WoS][Crossref]
  • 2. Betty R. (2011). Reliability and Validity of the Pain Vignettes. Ferrell & Margo McCaffery.
  • 3. Bosch J.L. et al.: Estimating general-population utilities using one binary-gamble question per respondent. Med Decis Making., 18, 4,1998.[Crossref]
  • 4. Cambell A. (1981). The sense of well-being in America; Recent patterns and trends. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • 5. Farshad M. et al.: (2011). Determining utility values in patients with anterior cruciate ligament tears using clinical scoring systems. BMC Health Serv Res., 4, 11, 2011. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-182.[WoS][Crossref]
  • 6. Frederix G.W. et al.: (2013). Utility and work productivity data for economic evaluation of breast cancer therapies in the Netherlands and Sweden. Clin. Ther., 35, 4, 2013:e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j. clinthera.2013.03.009.[Crossref]
  • 7. Giné-Garriga M. et al.: Referral from primary care to a physical activity programme: establishing long-term adherence? A randomized controlled trial. Rationale and study design. BMC Public Health, 9, 31. 2009. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-9-31.[WoS][Crossref]
  • 8. Kane R. A. (2002) Quality of life. In: Encyclopaedia of Public Health. Vol. 3. New York: Macmillan Reference.
  • 9. Korfage I.J. et al.: Response shift due to diagnosis and primary treatment of localized prostate cancer: a then-test and a vignette study. Qual Life Res., 16, 10, 2007.[Crossref][WoS]
  • 10. Laventhal N. et al.: Ethics of resuscitation at different stages of life: a survey of perinatal physicians. Pediatrics. 127, 5, 2011 doi: 10.1542/ peds.2010-1031.[Crossref][WoS]
  • 11. Nordenfelt L. (1993). Quality of life, heath and happiness. Aldershot: Avebury
  • 12. Osborne R.H. et al.: Health-related quality of life advantage of long-acting injectable antipsychotic treatment for schizophrenia: a time trade-off study. Health Qual Life Outcomes, 35, 10, 2012. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-10-35.[Crossref]
  • 13. Quartin A.A. et al.: Influence of critical illness on physicians’ prognoses for underlying disease: a randomized study using simulated cases.; Critical care medicine, 36, 2, 2008.
  • 14. Racine E. et al.: Profiles of Neurological Outcome Prediction Among Intensivists; Neurocrit Care, 11,3, 2009. doi:10.1007/ s12028-009-9225-9.[WoS][Crossref]
  • 15. Raeburn J.M., RootmanI. (1996). Quality of life and health promotion. In Renwick R., Brown I., Nagler M. (Ed.): Quality of Life in Health Promotion and Rehabilitation. Conceptual approaches, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • 16. Rossetto A., Jorm A.F., Reavley N.J.: Quality of helping behaviors of members of the public towards a person with a mental illness: a descriptive analysis of data from an Australian national survey. Annals of General Psychiatry, 13, 1, 2014. doi: 10.1186/1744-859X-13-2.[Crossref]
  • 17. Schnelle J.F. et al.: A controlled trial of an intervention to increase resident choice in long term care. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 14, 5, 2013.[Crossref]
  • 18. Schwartz C.E. et al.: The clinical significance of adaptation to changing health: A meta-analysis of response shift. Quality of Life Research 15,9, 2006. doi: 10.1007/s11136-006-0025-9.[Crossref]
  • 19. Sheldricket C.R. et al.: Variations in Physician Attitudes Regarding ADHD and Their Association With Prescribing Practices. Journal of Attention Disorders 9, 11, 2012.
  • 20. Shingler S.L. et al. Elicitation of health state utilities in soft tissue sarcoma. Quality of Life Research 22, 7, 2013. doi: 10.1007/ s11136-012-0301-9.[Crossref]
  • 21. Swinburn P. et al.: Elicitation of health state utilities in neuroendocrine tumours. J Med Econ.15, 4, 2012. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.670175.[Crossref]
  • 22. Xie F., Oremus M., Gaebel K.: Measuring health-related quality-oflife for Alzheimer’s disease using the general public. Quality of Life Research, 21, 4, 2012.

Document Type

Publication order reference


YADDA identifier

JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.