Preferences help
enabled [disable] Abstract
Number of results
2006 | 4 | 1 | 92-110
Article title

Environmental and economic comparison of waste solvent treatment options

Title variants
Languages of publication
The sustainable development and consumption need more efficient use of natural resources. As a consequence, the use of industrial solvents demands their recovery instead of end-of-pipe treatment. It is not always clear, however, which treatment alternative should be applied. Based on an industrial case study, the environmental and economic evaluation and comparison of the treatment alternatives of a non-ideal solvent mixture containing azeotropes is investigated for determining the preferable option. For the recovery of the industrial solvent mixture, two different separation alternatives are evaluated: a less effective alternative and a novel design based on hybrid separation tools. An end-of-pipe treatment alternative, incineration, is also considered and the split of the solvent mixtures between recovery and incineration is investigated. The environmental evaluation of the alternatives is carried out using ‘Eco-indicator 99 life-cycle impact assessment methodology’. Economic investigation is also accomplished. The economic features clearly favour the total recovery, however, the environmental evaluation detects that if a recovery process of low efficiency is applied, its environmental burden can be similar or even higher than that of the incineration. This motivates engineers to design more effective recovery processes and reconsider the evaluation of process alternatives at environmental decision making.
Physical description
1 - 3 - 2006
1 - 3 - 2006
  • [1] World Commission on Environment and Development (“Brundtland Committee”): Our Common future, Oxford Univ. Press., 1987.
  • [2] R.B. Bakshi and J. Fiksel: “The Quest for Sustainability: Challenges for Process Systems Engineering”, AIChE J., Vol. 47, (2003), pp. 1350–1358.[Crossref]
  • [3] T.D. Allen and R.D. Shonnard: “Green Engineering: Environmentally Conscious Design of Chemical Processes and Products”, AIChE J., Vol. 47, (2001), pp. 1906–1910.[Crossref]
  • [4] C.J. Periera: “Environmentally friendly processes”, Chem. Eng. Sci., Vol. 54, (1999), pp. 1959–1973.[Crossref]
  • [5] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: The Presidential Green Chemistry Challenge Awards Program, EPA 744-K-96-001, 1996.
  • [6] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: The Presidential Green Chemistry Challenge Awards Program, EPA 744-S-97-001, 1997.
  • [7] P. Mizsey: “Waste reduction strategy in the chemical industry”, J. Hazardous Mat., Vol. 37, (1994), pp. 1–13.[Crossref]
  • [8] Y. Sardessai and S. Bhosle: “Tolerance of bacteria to organic solvents”, Res. Microbiol., Vol. 153, (2002), pp. 263–268.[Crossref]
  • [9] E.N. Pistikupoulus and S.K. Stefanis: “Optimal solvent design for environmental impact minimization”, Computers & Chem. Eng., Vol. 22, (1998), pp. 717–733.[Crossref]
  • [10] S.K. Stefanis, A. Buxton, A.G. Livingston, E.N. Pistikopoulus: “A methodology for environmental impact minimization: solvent design and reaction path synthesis issues”, Comp. & Chem. Eng., Vol. 20 Suppl., (1996), pp. S1419–S1424.[Crossref]
  • [11] M. Sinha, L.E.K. Achenie and G. Ostrovksy: “Environmentally benign solvent design by global optimization”, Comp. & Chem. Eng., Vol. 23, (1999), pp. 1381–1394.[Crossref]
  • [12] T.B. Hofstetter, C. Capello, K. Hungerbühler: “Environmentally preferable treatment options for industrial waste solvent management - A Case Study of a Toluene Containing Waste Solvent”, Trans I. Chem. E, Vol. 81, Part B, (2003), pp. 189–202.
  • [13] H. Chen and R.D. Shonnard: “Systematic Framework for Environmentally Conscious Chemical Process Design: Early and Detailed Design Stages”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., Vol. 43, (2004) pp. 535–552.[Crossref]
  • [14] M. Goedkoop and R. Spriensma: The Eco-indicator 99, a Damage Oriented Method for Life Cycle Assessment, Methodolgy Report, Pre Consultants, the Netherlands, 2000,
  • [15] ISO 14040: Life cycle assessment-principles and framework, 1997.
  • [16] H. Wenzel, M. Hauschild and L. Alting: Environmental Assessment of Products-Methodology, Tools and Case Studies in Product Development, Chapman & Hall, London, 1997.
  • [17] T. Hofstetter: Abfalösunsmittelbewirtschaftung in der chemischen Industrie, Forschungsprogramm UAW, Bundesamtes für Energie, 2002.
  • [18] Sima Pro 5.1, more details at
  • [19] P. Mizsey, A. Raab, J. Manczinger, A. Szanyi and Z. Fonyo: Intensification of a Solvent Recovery Technology Through the Use of Hybrid Equipment, Oral lecture on ESCAPE 12, Danemark, Haag, 2002.
  • [20] A. Szanyi, P. Mizsey and Z. Fonyó: “Novel Hybrid Separation Process For Solvent Recovery Based on Positioning the Extractive Heterogeneous-azeotropic Distillation”, Chem. Eng. Proc., Vol. 43, (2004), pp. 327–338.[Crossref]
  • [21] A. Raab: Separation of a Highly Nonideal Mixture for Solvent Recovery, Thesis (Diploma), Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Department of Chemical Engineering, Hungary, Budapest 2001.
  • [22] P.T. Anastas and J.C. Warner: Green Chemistry, Theory and Praxis, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998.
  • [23] Ch. Seyler: Ein inputabhängiges Ökoinventar-Modell für die thermische Verwertung von Abfall-Lösungsmittel in der chemisch-pharmazeutischen Industrie, Thesis (PhD), Eidgenössiche Technische Hochschule Zürich, Zürich, 2003.
  • [24] J.M. Douglas: Conceptual Design of Chemical Processes, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1989.
  • [25] “Economic indicators”, Chemical Engineering, Vol. 111, (2004), pp. 79–80.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.